|
PRESIDENT’S REPORT
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| TO: | Heather
Brooker John MacLennan Betty Bannon Jeannette Meunier-McKay John Edmonds Ron Moran Yves Ducharme Ray Strike Mark Brunell |
FROM: Nycole Turmel
RE: Component Representation
At most, if not all, of your Component Conventions I addressed issues with regard to Component representation that are, or are perceived to be, problematical, and indicated that I would address these issues in a substantive way before leaving office next May.
On November 14, 2005, a number of representation issues were addressed by members of the NBoD who sit on the Roles, Responsibilities and Structure Committee. While the Committee appreciates the impact of changes in Component representation, it has concluded, as a general guiding principle, that a single Component should represent members within a single government department or agency.
The next step in this process is to discuss Component affiliation/ representation with Component Presidents and where the potentially affected members are currently housed. This process started on November 28, 2005 and will continue over the next two weeks.
It is my intention to render an interim decision in most, if not all, of the affected departments/ agencies by year end. The decisions will be interim in order to provide the Components concerned with an opportunity to clarify issues with me and engage in discussions with other Components to discuss transition issues.
I have also decided that any change to Component representation that flows from this process will take effect on March 31, 2006 at the latest.
In Solidarity,
Nycole Turmel
National President
c.c. Component Presidents
REVPs
It is expected that the PSAC President will render her decision some time in December. Any challenges to her decision will have to go to the January Board meeting.
There have been a few occasions of council members arranging and finalizing meetings, courses etc. and then asking for authorization to do so. This is a reminder to all council members that if you are expecting to be reimbursed or to expend UTE funds for any union business, it must be authorized union business, in accordance with our By-laws and Regulations.
There have been several meetings with the CRA. After most of them a short summary of the meeting and the presentation decks were sent to Council and/or the locals. The following is a list of the meetings : Cash and Client Service meeting with the Political Action Committee (2X), UMI Training with the other Unions and Management representatives, the CRA Policy Review Committee for an update on the status of the Travel/Mobility Policy, Revenue Collections 2010 vision, Competency Based HR Management Advisory Group, a one on one meeting with Lysanne Gauvin, Finance and Administration reorganization Phase II, Official Languages, Transfer of Overpayment Group from HRDC, an initial Essential Service Agreement meeting, a meeting regarding the SR&D workload and a Union meeting with Michel Dorais regarding the 2010 vision.
As you are aware the expected negotiated raises were not implemented on our paycheques on the due date. Once the National Office was advised I immediately contacted the CRA. We were advised of the reason for the delay and our expected reaction to their explanation was not surprising. Unless the computers at the CRA and elsewhere were non functioning and manual cheques were required there is little else that would have satisfied as an explanation for this happening. Grievance wording was provided to all locals and talks continued with the CRA until the matter was concluded as to the expected date of the implementation of the pay raises and what would happen for future pay raises. The PSAC believes that this was the first time that any employer failed to implement a negotiated pay settlement on the due date. We have also filed a Policy Grievance on this issue and a date for a hearing is being discussed.
Finally, on November 23rd, the employer activated a link on the INFOZONE to our website. I am being advised that the members are reacting very positively regarding this new development and our “subscribe” count is going up daily. This has been a long time in coming but I attribute the success of this to our never ending persistence on the issue.
We are still dealing with a backlog of information that needs to be updated or put on the web. We are making some headway, but we’re still about 3-4 weeks behind in the process. During the period of this report, we worked on September’s newsletter and December’s newsletter. We updated all of the new by-laws and regulations on the website. We have also created the first draft of the extranet website which will store the files sent to the locals. http://www.ute-sei.org/resource/ A username and password will be provided to everyone for access and the password will be changed from time to time.
We have been busy with the move and move related items. This included looking at our current printing and photocopying equipment as well as looking at power requirements and network requirements for the new space. Sister Duncan has spent some time in a consultative role as we looked at the various equipment needs of our new boardroom and our IT room.
We have spent time updating systems and fixing problems on computers, including office computers and RVP laptops. During this period, we had 3 laptops in for repair. Two were in such bad shape that the vendor replaced the equipment. Office systems required updating to the latest software, scanning for Trojans/malware. We also had a monitor go ‘up in smoke’ and one pc needed replacing.
We are examining our upcoming IT needs and putting priorities and timeframes on some of the more urgent items.
We advertised for the IT Officer position and have received a large number of resumes that we are now going through. We hope to have someone hired for the New Year.
Since our last Executive Council meeting, fifty-nine (59) grievances, other than classification, were received at the National Office.
During the same period, fifty-three (53) grievances were presented dealing with a variety of issues, including: three (3) suspensions, two (2) terminations and three (3) harassment.
OPENED INVENTORY |
RECV’D |
TO BE |
AWAITING REPLY |
ADJ. |
CLOSED |
Nov. 96 – Nov. 97 |
392 |
|
|
391 |
|
Dec. 97 – Feb. 08/98 |
11 |
|
|
|
11 |
Feb. 09/98 – May 25/98 |
117 |
|
|
|
117 |
May 26/98 – Sept. 04/98 |
111 |
|
|
|
111 |
Sept. 05/98 – Nov. 04/98 |
38 |
|
|
37 |
|
Nov. 06/98 – March 01/99 |
71 |
|
|
|
71 |
March 01/99 – June 01/99 |
83 |
|
|
|
83 |
June 01/99 – Sept. 10/99 |
64 |
|
|
|
64 |
Sept. 10/99 – Dec. 01/99 |
266 |
|
|
|
266 |
Dec. 01/99 – March 22/00 |
1321 |
|
3 |
|
1318 |
March 22/00 – June 06/00 |
26 |
|
|
|
26 |
June 06/00 – Sept. 01/00 |
132 |
|
1 |
4 |
127 |
Sept. 01/00 – Dec. 01/00 |
67 |
1 |
|
6 |
60 |
Dec. 02/00 – Feb. 28/01 |
176 |
3 |
|
|
173 |
March 01/01 – June 01/01 |
33 |
|
|
|
33 |
June 01/01 – Sept. 01/01 |
30 |
|
|
2 |
28 |
Sept. 02/01 – Dec. 05/01 |
41 |
2 |
1 |
|
38 |
Dec. 05/01 – Feb. 28/02 |
49 |
|
|
|
49 |
March 01/02 – May 31/02 |
59 |
|
2 |
9 |
48 |
June 01/02 – Aug. 31/02 |
54 |
|
12 |
1 |
41 |
Sept. 01/02 – Dec. 31/02 |
64 |
|
17 |
2 |
45 |
Jan. 01/03 – Feb. 28/03 |
64 |
8 |
19 |
12 |
25 |
March 01/03 – May 31/03 |
126 |
4 |
39 |
27 |
56 |
June 01/03 – Aug. 31/03 |
32 |
14 |
|
5 |
13 |
Sept. 01/03 – Nov. 30/03 |
36 |
7 |
2 |
1 |
26 |
Dec. 01/03 – March 31/04 |
100 |
13 |
3 |
21 |
63 |
April 1/04 – May 31/04 |
38 |
9 |
3 |
16 |
10 |
June 01/04 – Aug. 31/04 |
66 |
9 |
7 |
22 |
28 |
Sept. 01/04 – Nov. 30/04 |
24 |
5 |
3 |
3 |
13 |
Dec. 01/04 – Feb. 28/05 |
36 |
6 |
2 |
19 |
9 |
March 01/05 – May 31/05 |
48 |
12 |
9 |
16 |
11 |
June 01/05 – Aug. 31/05 |
35 |
21 |
13 |
|
1 |
Sept 01/05 – Nov 30/05 |
59 |
46 |
10 |
|
3 |
There are presently one hundred and sixty (160) grievances in the National Office inventory, which have not yet been presented at the Final Level.
During this quarter, we received two classification grievances.
|
RECV’D |
REFERRED TO PSAC |
Pending additional information or finalization of job content grievance |
Jan. 01/02 – Feb. 28/03 |
116 |
20 |
24 |
March 01/03 – May 31/03 |
64 |
5 |
54 |
June 1/03 – Aug. 31/03 |
2 |
|
|
Sept. 01/03 – Nov. 30/03 |
2 |
|
1 |
Dec. 01/03 – March 31/04 |
8 |
|
3 |
Apr. 01/04 – May 31/04 |
6 |
|
6 |
June 01/04 – Aug. 31/04 |
17 |
2 |
15 |
Sept. 01/04 – Nov. 30/04 |
5 |
|
5 |
Dec. 01/04 – Feb. 14/05 |
3 |
|
2 |
Feb. 15/05 – May 31/05 |
4 |
|
4 |
June 01/05 – Aug. 31/05 |
0 |
|
|
Sept 01/05 – Nov 30/05 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
During this period, no appeal was received in the National Office where the Union of Taxation Employees was requested to provide representation.
For this report, a physical review was conducted of all outstanding ITPR’s.
At the end of last quarter there were six (6) ITPR’s that had been received in the National Office that had not been presented or scheduled as of the end of that period. During this quarter, an additional six (6) ITPR’s have been received. Accordingly, as of this date, there were twelve (12) active ITPR’s in the National Office.
Of these twelve (12) active ITPR’s, one (1) has now been withdrawn, five (5) have recently been heard (with no decision rendered to date) and six (6) have yet to be scheduled. Of the six (6) yet to be scheduled, all are currently in the process of disclosure and are being actively worked.
| SEPTEMBER: | |
| 12 – 17 | Executive Council and Presidents Conference |
| 22 – 25 | PSAC Unity Conference |
| OCTOBER: | |
| 4 – 5 | PSAC National Board of Directors |
| 6 | Winnipeg TC AGM |
| 12 | UTE Political Action Committee and CRA meeting. |
| 13 | UMI Training |
| 17 – 20 | 2005 Interdepartmental Labour Relations Symposium |
| 24 | Halifax AGM |
| 25 | Charlottetown AGM |
| 26 | Toronto West AGM |
| 28 | Move meeting regarding the Board Room |
| NOVEMBER: | |
| 1 | Meeting with new PSAC Classification Officer |
| 1 | Move meeting regarding the Board Room |
| 4 | Competency Based HR Management Advisory Group meeting NCR Regional Meeting |
| 7 | Meeting with Lysanne Gauvin regarding the CRA 5 year review |
| 8 | Crowne Plaza meeting |
| 14 | PSAC Roles and Responsibility Committee |
| 15 | Meeting with the CRA regarding the Essential Service Agreement |
| 17 | All Component meeting regarding Exclusions and Essential Service Agreements under the new legislation |
| 20 - 25 | Ontario Federation of Labour Convention |
| 28 | CBSA, CRA meeting with Nycole Turmel, Ron Moran, Jeannette Meunier-McKay |
| 28 | Move meeting regarding Central filing |
| 30 | UTE Political Action Committee and CRA meeting |
| DECEMBER: | |
| 1 | Meeting with Commissioner, M Dorais regarding the CRA 2010 Vision |
Visit often, and send us your comments to the webmaster@ute-sei.org if you have any problems.