![]() |
![]() |
|
Thursday September 2, 2010
|
|
Staffing Committee
|
| home |
|
|
|
|
|
Meetings were held with the Employer June 20th-23rd, July 19th to 21st and September 6th to 8th.
During the meeting in June discussions were held on the actual ACS Standard. We were provided with an opportunity to discuss the standard and provide our comments to the employer on changes we would like to see. Brother Lamoreux provided a written submission to the employer following our meeting. The employer then went on to discuss the BETA 2 testing that they had conducted and advised that it appeared the standard was measuring the descriptions as expected.
During the second day of the June meeting we discussed Consolidation. The employer advised that as the actual conversion to ACS seemed to be taking longer than expected they would like to proceed with consolidation of the job descriptions as per the list shared with the union. It was agreed that consolidation may provide an opportunity to introduce the new short work description format but education would have to be done as these would still be evaluated under the legacy standards.
We discussed our concerns with the employers definition of “ Generic” vs “Generalist”. The agreement was we needed to get a consistent definition of these terms.
Education was then discussed, the employer advised that they had concerns about the original approach and had determined that the target audience should be HR Community, MG’s and Union leaders. We agreed to consider the employers proposal and a meeting would be scheduled for July for a planning session as to how this should be rolled out.
The employer advised that they wanted to have a few focus group sessions with the MG community to find out what they thought of the new format and to get some additional feedback on the content. The sessions would be run from August 14-21st and the suggested locations were, Vancouver, Winnipeg, Sudbury, Toronto, Montreal, Shawinigan and Halifax. WE suggested they look at the NS TSO not “ Halifax” as this was now a combined office and as well they should hit either St John’s or Saint John to get input on new Call Center environment. The employer agreed and subsequently added Saint John to the list.
Management advised that all MG’s who were not part of the focus groups would have involvement in a video conference. Members of the focus groups would be asked their opinions of the short format, training requirements of the employees and then to provide feedback on a sample of 60 job descriptions.
The employer expected the training session would be available to be shared
with the union in September.
September would see the finalization of the consolidation plan and an updated
website. The employer advised they wished to develop a video to be
used in training and a discussion followed as to what it could contain.
The employers original vision of Union /Management trainers to jointly
deliver three hour sessions to all employees has been modified. The
employer now wishes to proceed with SP Contacts ( union and management
in each office). The intent is to develop a video to be used during
team meetings. Team Leaders would show the video to their team and
have available upon request the contact to answer any queries. The
union and management contacts in each local will be the ones to train the
MG’s. The union committed to updating the “ Training” list
and providing this t the employer, they will then match the number
of trainers in each location.
Preliminary discussions were held on the possibility of an MOU and we committed
to discuss this with Sister Bannon.
The employer hoped the preliminary results of the gender neutrality study would be completed when we meet in September.
The employer provided a review and update of the video conference and focus groups. The video conference was held August 9th and the 11 focus group sessions were conducted between the 13th to the 23rd. In addition to the original locations indicate the employer also conducted 3 sessions in HQ. Overall, managers liked the short format. They recommended a gradual informing of staff and stated there should not be any announcements using the “ national Distribution” list. For training suggestions included talking to employees prior to the roll out and they were optimistic regarding the use of a video. They did indicate tools should be provided highlighting an existing job description as to what areas were actually used in the classification under the legal act standard to help employees understand what was actually classified in a description.
The employer outlined the proposed training plan and after some discussion the following was agreed to:
Visit often, and send us your comments to the webmaster@ute-sei.org if you have any problems.
Copyright © 2000-2010 UTE All Rights Reserved