Union of Taxation Employees
REGULATION NO. 26
26.1 DISCIPLINE PROCEDURES
26.1.1 General
(1) Notwithstanding the procedures
contained in this Regulation, disciplinary procedures may be initiated
in accordance with the By-Laws at a higher level than where the actions
giving rise to disciplinary action occurred.
(2) Any accusation(s) which is found
to be frivolous or intended to harass, embarrass, or discredit a member
or members may result in a recommendation of disciplinary action to be
included in the committee report.
(3) Any member against whom an accusation
of misconduct is alleged shall not be a member of the Committee established
to investigate the allegation(s), and shall not be given voice or vote
in the decision to accept or reject the findings and recommendations
of such a committee.
(4) Should the Committee in the
process of their investigation receive information that leads to other
provisions of the By-Laws, the Committee shall notify the member(s) concerned
in writing and provide an opportunity for the member(s) concerned to
respond. This information now becomes part of the investigation.
(5) The procedure for dealing with
any disciplinary situation which may arise at the local, PSAC Regional
Area Council, PSAC National Board of Directors or Alliance Executive
levels as found in the Constitution.
(6) The procedure for dealing with
any disciplinary situation, which may arise, which is not specifically
outlined under this Regulation, shall be deemed to be covered and processed
within the spirit and intent of this Regulation.
26.2 INVESTIGATION PROCEDURES
(1) Any and all allegations against
a member shall be in writing, signed by the member(s) putting forth the
allegation(s), and submitted to the appropriate body for consideration:
(2) (a) allegations
at the local level shall be submitted to the Local Executive;
(b) allegations that involve member(s)
from more than one Local in a region shall be submitted to the Regional
Vice-President;
(c) allegations that involve
member(s) from more than one region shall be submitted to the President;
(d) allegations against Regional
Vice-Presidents or Vice-Presidents shall be submitted to the President;
(e) allegations against the President
in the capacity of component President shall be submitted to the 1st
Vice-President;
(f) allegations against
the President in the capacity of a member of the National Board of Directors
shall be submitted to the PSAC Executive Committee.
(3) The appropriate executive body
receiving the allegation(s) shall determine whether *evidence warrants
an investigation. If so, it shall establish an internal or external
impartial investigation committee consisting of three (3) people to investigate
and assess the allegation(s), including the receipt of oral and written
evidence. (*evidence in that there must be some supporting documentation
that the allegations are valid. It does not mean that conclusive
evidence must be presented nor does it mean that the body concerned is
accepting or rejecting the supporting documentation.)
(4) The Committee shall provide
the member against whom the allegation has been made with a copy of the
written accusation(s). The member(s) submitting the allegation(s)
and the member(s) against whom the allegation has been made, shall be
afforded the right to appear before the Committee. The Committee
may interview witnesses.
(5) The Committee shall submit a
committee report to the member against whom the allegation(s) has been
made, the member(s) who submitted the allegation(s) and the appropriate
body who established the Committee.
(6) The committee report shall consist
of one or two parts, depending on whether the allegation(s) are upheld
by the Committee:
(a) Part l shall include a finding
of fact for each accusation(s) and a determination whether a contravention
of the By-Laws occurred. This part of the Report may also include
a determination whether any accusation is found to be frivolous or intended
to harass, embarrass or discredit a member.
(b) Part ll shall indicate if corrective
action is recommended including any specific disciplinary action such
as, suspension from membership and/or removal from office.
(c) The committee report shall
be dated and signed by the three people on the Committee and shall not
be amended. The appropriate body that established the Committee must
be satisfied that the proper procedure has been followed by the Committee
and shall vote whether to accept the committee report in accordance with
General Provisions 26.1.1(3).
(7) If disciplinary action is not
recommended, the appropriate body shall review and vote whether to accept
the committee report. A simple majority vote of those in attendance
shall determine acceptance. All decisions shall be conveyed in
writing to the persons involved.
(8) If disciplinary
action is recommended at the national level, the committee report shall
be subject to acceptance by a two-thirds (2/3) majority vote at a meeting
of the Executive Council. Should the committee report recommendations
not receive two-thirds (2/3) acceptance, rationale for the rejection
must be provided.
(a) If the Executive Council accepts
a recommendation of removal from office, the President shall provide
the member(s) concerned with written notice that an appeal may be submitted
to the PSAC National Board of Directors within sixty (60) calendar days
of receipt of the disciplinary notification.
(b) If the Executive Council accepts
a recommendation to suspend or expel from membership the President shall
submit such recommendation to the PSAC National Board of Directors together
with all relevant documentation.
26.3 GUIDELINES FOR INVESTIGATION PROCEDURES
26.3.1 Investigation Committee
(1) The role and responsibilities
of the Committee include:
(a) providing the member accused
with a copy of the written accusation(s);
(b) ensuring the investigation is
impartial and is seen as such by all parties;
(c) investigating the allegations
with appropriate discretion and ensuring that the investigation
is done in a timely fashion;
(d) interviewing witnesses and reviewing
all relevant documents identified by the parties;
(e) submitting a written report
to the body which established the Committee, the member making the accusation
and the member accused.
26.3.2 Investigation Procedures
(1) The members of the Committee
shall develop the appropriate methodology for the investigation based
on the allegation(s) and the mandate of the Committee.
(2) The member making the accusation
and the member accused may provide the Committee with a list of witnesses
to be interviewed by the Committee. A witness is an individual who witnessed
the alleged misconduct or who has some other type of relevant information
that will assist in determining whether a contravention occurred. The
committee shall determine which witnesses they believe may have relevant
information related to the allegation. A process for interviewing
witnesses shall be developed, for example, the Committee may determine
whether witnesses shall be given the option of providing a narrative
in their own words, respond to questions from the Committee, or a combination
of both.
(3) The committee shall ensure that:
(a) witnesses are advised of the
mandate of the Committee;
(b) witnesses are aware that they
may be accompanied by a person of their choice to the interview;
(c) interviews are conducted
in an appropriate confidential area;
(d) the applicable portion of the
draft report be sent to witnesses for review of their statements when
such statements are used in the report;
(e) all Committee members take their
own notes during the interview.
26.3.3 Committee Report
(1) As required by this Regulation,
the committee report shall be written in one or two parts. Part 1 shall
include a finding of fact for each allegation and a determination whether
the contravention of the constitution, Local, and/or UTE, and/or PSAC
By-Laws occurred. This part of the report may also include a determination
whether any allegation is found to be frivolous or intended to harass,
embarrass or discredit a member.
(a) Part I of the committee report
might also include:
(i) committee composition;
(ii) description of the alleged
misconduct;
(iii) mandate of committee;
(iv) methodology (including reference
materials, list of witnesses and dates of interviews.);
(v) findings.
(b) Part 2 of the report shall indicate
whether corrective action is recommended including any specific disciplinary
action. When an allegation of misconduct involves harassment, the
committee report shall not include the actual names of those involved
with the exception of the name of the individual who is recommended for
discipline. This measure shall provide some confidentiality in
the event that the committee report is submitted to the Executive Council
and included in the minutes.
(2) The committee shall submit a
draft copy of the final report to the body that authorized the establishment
of the committee for review and amendments if deemed necessary, prior
to sending it to the Executive Council. Any amendments must be
agreed to by the committee; such amendments shall be for clarification
or process purposes only.
26.4 APPEAL PROCESS
(1) The appeal hearing shall be
established within a three-month (3) period unless the time-frame is
extended by a mutual agreement of the parties concerned or if the Executive
Council determines that extenuating circumstances prohibit the establishment
of the appeal hearing within the above-noted time-frame.
(2) If disciplinary action is recommended
at the local level, the Local Executive shall submit the committee report
at a special or general meeting of the Local and shall be subject to
the acceptance of two-thirds (2/3) of those members in attendance in
accordance to General Provisions 26.1.1. Should the committee
report recommendations not receive two-thirds (2/3) acceptance, rationale
for the rejection must be provided.
(3) If the Local meeting accepts
a recommendation of removal from office, the Local Executive shall convey
in writing that decision to the member or members concerned together
with written notice that an appeal may be submitted to the President
within sixty (60) calendar days of receipt of the disciplinary notification.
(4) The appellant has the right
to be heard and to be represented at the appeal hearing.
(5) The appeal decision of the Executive
Council shall be final and binding on all parties to the appeal.
(6) The UTE shall be responsible
for the cost of the hearing and the expenses as follows:
(a) each party shall be responsible
for his/her own expenses, except that if the appellant’s appeal
is successful, the appellant may be entitled to reasonable expenses
as determined by the Executive Council;
(b) the expenses of the representative
of the appellant shall be borne by the appellant;
(c) each party shall normally
be responsible for any expenses incurred as a result of testimony from
any witness they wish to call. However, where the appeal is upheld,
the appellant may, in extenuating circumstances, request full or partial
payment of reasonable expenses incurred by witnesses for the appellant. Such
expenses whose reasonableness shall be determined solely by the Executive
Council.
26.5 GUIDELINES FOR APPEAL PROCESS
(1) The appeal process is an informal
one so that it is accessible to all members and shall allow the parties
involved to be heard. The procedure shall be as follows:
(a) The appellant or their representative
shall make a presentation to the Executive Council outlining why he/she
does not believe the removal from office, or other disciplinary action
is justified;
(b) any witnesses for the appellant
shall make a presentation to the Executive Council outlining any role
they were involved with which impacted upon the removal from office,
or other disciplinary decision;
(c) the representative from
the appropriate Local shall make a presentation to the Executive Council
outlining why the action to remove from office, or other disciplinary
action was taken;
(d) any witnesses for the Local
shall make a presentation to the Executive Council outlining any role
they were involved with which impacted upon the removal from office,
or other disciplinary action decision;
(e) the Executive Council members
may ask questions of clarification, which arise from the presentations;
(f) both the appellant
and representative from the Local shall be provided with an opportunity
to make a closing summary;
(g) the Executive Council members
shall render a written decision. The President shall forward the
decision to the parties involved.
26.6 REMOVAL FROM OFFICE
(1) Notwithstanding the above, the
removal from office provisions of this Regulation shall be deemed
to have been complied with by a Local under the following conditions:
(a)
When provision is made in the Local by-laws for a referendum vote of
the membership of the particular constituency represented by the officer
proposed for removal from office;
or,
(b) When, in the case of an officer
who was elected by representatives rather than by direct membership election,
provision is made in the Local by-laws for a vote by representatives
of the particular constituency represented by the officer proposed for
removal from office.
| Adopted September 1978 |
Amended July 2005 |
| Amended December 1992 |
Amended June 2006 |
| Amended March 1993 |
|
| Amended December 1996 |
|
| Amended June 2000 |
|
| Amended March 2002 |
|
|